CuppaGemma

Be curious. Be kind. Learn and build on.

CuppaGemma header image 1

Teams 2.0

January 18th, 2014 · Views from Startup Land

What are you doing? Why does it matter?
Can you do this, and do I want to do this with you?

Startups have to build teams.

We build based on a belief in our idea and the group of people who are committed to making it real- can and will execute the concept. There is a shared sense of risk, and a willingness to work in that context.

The culture of a start up is defined by every interaction. How do you build relationships, and with whom? What’s the energy and atmosphere you align yourself with as much as the one you create from how you say hello, and what you choose to make time to attend.

Start ups are not glamorous, they take a lot of hard work. Successful teams focus on what they can do together, and the change they are bringing to the world, one small set of adopters at a time. It’s not about risk for risk’s sake, or an adrenaline high for the unknown.

Start up teams that succeed share drive, and a willingness to say, “We made a mistake, here’s what we are doing next.” Full stop. No whinge fest or blame game or “Yeah but…” Instead those teams share a relentlessness to solve and go onward.

A consistent theme I’ve noticed with the most successful teams is at the core those teams want to succeed more than they are afraid.

They thrive with emergent, concurrent and shifting challenges.

Grit is in their DNA.

Comments Off on Teams 2.0Tags:

For Japan

March 25th, 2011 · Older Essays

The breaking news has passed. The streaming updates have been taken down. We have seen the tsunami footage enough.

But there are hundreds of thousands of people who are homeless, living in temporary shelters. Families are broken because not everyone lived. Bodies are still being found, thousands remain missing. Radiation concerns remain.

For people in Japan it is not yesterday’s news story. It remains a very current mark on their days. It will continue to be, because it takes a little while to rebuild a life, a home and adjust to changes in family.

That’s not really a story that gets covered. The urgency and graphic images of destruction- interesting and read. The hopeful story of a person found days later, or of pets reunited- nice and also worth a read.

The day in day out matter of cleaning up and rebuilding and cleaning up and rebuilding and how long it takes till enough is done to deeply rest- perhaps not so compelling. We want the story to cut to montages and music. We prefer the nodes the to actually travel the steps in each arc.

Commonness can be compelling. So a small group of people come and help each other, and keep helping each other. And there is a silent compassion because of the family that was lost. Who stands today as an elder with no children? Or a child with no parents? Or a husband without his wife? And they keep at it, because it is necessary for life to go on.

The blossoms remind us of that. Life goes forward, it does not hang in seasons of the past.

I hope they remind us too, that life is precious and fleeting. So we ought to remember to look into each other’s eyes.

Comments Off on For JapanTags:

Children don’t come with instructions, parents get graded.

January 15th, 2011 · Older Essays

I admire Amy Chua.

She’s started a conversation because she’s found a way to tell a story that hits on many nerves. That doesn’t mean I agree or disagree with her choices, but when you can bring energy to a controversy, I respect the discussion that’s started.

Reality is relative and emotionally charged rhetoric cuts deep.

Every parent knows this, and every parent has a unique lens on life, culture and what a successful family means. I’ve know families who are adamant about homeschooling, sports, grades, volunteering, lifestyle and religion. I’m not going to say on is more or less right then the other.

We could all make impolite observations about each other, and point to one offs which illustrate the failure of a parent and a child. I’m not sure what that accomplishes really, and as a mom I get tired of posturing discussions where one side tries to prove worth by showing another side’s flaws.

It gets snippy really fast and everyone becomes reduced to stereotypes. We all try.  Kids are complex, they are not fixed- it’s all ongoing variables.

What does it mean to be a successful parent?

That your child attends a fancy school, with perfect grades?

Or that he can hold a conversation and treats others with respect and compassion?

That he led life driven and pushed along paths- or that he felt the messiness otherwise known as actual experience that cannot be carefully sculpted with selected (and avoided) exposure to people and places?

The list could goes on and the permutations are not mutually exclusive.

From a mother’s point of view- I respect there are many ways of doing things, and one way should not be taken out of context or distilled down to a few behaviors and then judged.

My own children were born and raised in a country and culture that was not their own which influenced how they developed- we had the privilege of not quite belonging to one culture, but to really consider how we introduced our own traditions to them. This includes relationships with extended family, and why they matter.

Parents and children are often judged, and the causalities are not often accurate or fair.

Then throw in culture and the pot boils over.

Is coddling a Western tradition? Is narrow mindedness or black and white thinking?

Have we sometimes gone too far with making sure everyone feels self esteem and success? Perhaps at times, yes. But then speak with people who have been bullied, or who work in schools where they have watched the dynamic play back and forth- there is merit in trying to be fair. If you really want to have the discussion, then the starting point is a very complex ecosystem where context is king.

What’s success?

Is it defined by your income- I don’t think that in and of itself equates to happiness. Is it achieving a certain level of job, earning potential, having the “right” spouse and correct number of children with appropriate grades and talents? To some maybe.

The larger question is- do you like your life, do like what you do in it? (And if not, what are you doing about it?)

That questions applies to both parents and children. I think if kids see a model of parents who are content, who are friends and companions that both work hard and enjoy their chosen profession it’s a good example. If children see that parents support them, at times push them- and even at times allow them to fail, there is a genuine reality in that. It’s important for children to see that their mother and father have roles beyond being their mother and father. They have adult relationships, they have work (and yes that means taking care of home). Life is not siloed.

Cultures are not inherently right or wrong- they are just networks of people who have commonness in how they relate and see life.

Kids need to see the wider context of community- there are different families, different schools, different paths. And somehow they also need to know there is a validity and a challenge in each of those paths.

Amy’s choices as a parent are for her and her family to decide if they worked. Her book is an approach, but not the only one and not a definitive commentary on a culture, or living one culture’s values while inhabiting another country and culture’s location.

The question I pose to parents and children- is how do you feel about your life? What do you want to do?

Comments Off on Children don’t come with instructions, parents get graded.Tags:

Table 2.0

December 25th, 2010 · Older Essays

Both leaves are in, we’ll have the dining room full. I am looking forward to this day.

What I remember most about family gatherings was the talking.

Of course there were special dishes prepared and china taken out, a kids table too- but what I most remember is lots of time with conversations. The pace of them changed but the flow- the flow was constant. You came and got caught up in the energy of everyone together.

We are grateful for togetherness.

Comments Off on Table 2.0Tags: